Vicki Pate has wrongfully accused me, tweeting;
I don’t often respond to false accusations, but this matter involves an attack on Shaun King that goes beyond his activism and fund raising. This past weekend, I tweeted a link to information that while Vicki Pate is the source for obtaining Shaun King’s birth certificate, that David Piercy is the person who tweeted it out to media people. Others on Twitter captured that link and tweeted it out.
Shaun King has written that his mom had an affair with a Black man during her marriage. David Piercy should know from experience that when a married woman gives birth, she must put her husband’s name on the birth certificate, even when she knows he is not the father.
Because Shaun King told the truth about his family, Vicki Pate now accuses him of making his mom look like a whore.
It now appears that Vicki Pate is going after the man who is listed as Shaun’s father on his birth certificate.
David Piercy has several Twitter accounts. His account @P4R4L3G4L is protected. His account @AtheistRadio75 is public. Here are screenshots to verify that the Twitter account AtheistRadio75 is David Piercy. First, Piercy posted documents that only he would have and/or care about.
(I have also downloaded his timeline in pdf format because Piercy has the tendency to delete tweets. Don’t worry about Piercy’s name calling. He’s been calling me names and “racist” for years without ever producing any proof.)
Next, he tweeted a school document that besides the school, only he would/should have.
As a side note: Piercy’s above tweet is his effort to defend himself against my statement that he engages in the unlicensed practice of law . Sorry David, but having an AA, even more than one, is not the same as having a Juris Doctorate and passing the Bar exam to be licensed to practice law.
On his Facebook page david.piercy.77, he likes his Facebook page for “The Conservative” that, as of the writing of this post, is the same avatar as that on his AtheistRadio75 Twitter account. Piercy also has a blogtalk radio channel titled “The Conservative Atheist” where you will see the same avatar along with his introduction by name and photograph.
It is through the AtheistRadio75 Twitter account that David Piercy tweeted Shaun King’s birth certificate to, among others, AC360, Wolf Blitzer, Sunny Hostin, Don Lemon, and Carol Costello of CNN.
Based on the above, there is no doubt that Conservative Atheist/@AtheistRadio75, is David Piercy.
David Piercy helped put Shaun King in a position of embarrassment to tell that his mom, while married, had an affair with a Black man. According to a decision entered by the Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District, Piercy’s Latina wife became pregnant by a Latino man while she was married to Piercy. Piercy, who is White, is listed on the little girl’s birth certificate as her father.
In a decision entered by the Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District, on December 13, 2012, they set forth the following background. Although I originally presented the exact verbiage of the decision, I received a non-argumentative, respectful request to remove the names of the ex-wife and daughter from what is posted on this blog, and I have done so.
“Piercy and (redacted) were married in January 2009 but did not live together until June 2010. They separated in September 2010. (redacted) gave birth to (daughter) in February 2011. Piercy is listed on the birth certificate as [daughter’s] father. When [daughter] was 4 months old, Piercy filed for divorce. He requested custody of [daughter]. (redacted) opposed that request declaring that Piercy had created a hostile living situation and had not provided any financial support. (redacted) also declared that Carlos Salcido, the man she was living with, was [daughter’s] father and that he provided both financial and emotional support to her and [daughter].”
“The trial court ordered a DNA test and concluded that David is not [daughter’s] biological father. The Court of Appeals decided that the trial court did not err in denying Piercy’s request for custody and visitation. Although Piercy qualified as a presumed father under California Family Code section 7611, the presumption was properly rebutted. (redacted) and Salcido are [daughter’s] biological parents.”
The Court’s full decision can be read here. Therefore, Piercy knows that just because Shaun King has a father on his birth certificate, does not mean that the man is his biological father anymore than Piercy, a White man, is the biological father of a child created by two Latino parents.
When the daughter grows up and if she applies for scholarships set-aside for Latino students, or enters activism for Latino equal rights, how would he feel if someone like them gets her birth certificate and accuses her of lying about her race?
Even more importantly, how would Piercy feel if the daughter had to publicly come forward and air her mom’s private life and extra martial affairs?