David Piercy Uses Vicki Pate As His Surrogate, and a Stranger Rode Into Town As Vicki Pate’s Surrogate.
(Screenshots from Twitter and information about the contempt proceeding were provided to me by Santiago Rodriguez who asked that I write to make his situation public in this series.)
To recap, in July 2014, a California court entered a restraining order against David Piercy, including ordering him to remove the protected parties’ personal information from the internet that he had posted, and to not contact the protected parties directly or indirectly. After the court entered its order, the same material posted by David Piercy that the court ordered removed, was posted on Vicki Pate’s blog. Vicki also posted the material on Scribd.
In November 2014, Vicki Pate posted defamatory, harassing, derogatory, material on her blog and Scribd account about Santiago, using documents that Piercy purchased from a court.
Vicki’s declaration, and the court’s restraining order were submitted to the hosting companies. Between November 2014 and January 2015, Blogger, Soundcloud, Scribd, Facebook and Twitter were kept busy removing material posted by Piercy and/or Vicki. It was almost a daily event.
Vicki accused Santiago for the taking down of the material she posted. All of the aforementioned hosting companies understood the court’s order and complied. Santiago did not need to convince them — they have their own legal departments.
Update: I was recently informed by Vicki Pate that what Santiago told me is not true. Vicki stated that she voluntarily took down those pages because they alleged that “Xena” is “Barbara J. Wells” and she had no proof to support that allegation.
New accounts on Twitter popped up, and some of the same material, with Piercy’s original “convicted woman beater” allegations were circulated on Twitter.
The “convicted woman beater” is a matter of semantics. Santiago’s ex-wife was granted an Order of Protection against him. In their divorce, the court ordered a continuing restraining order against Santiago. However, it was not a criminal case that required a conviction or acquittal.
As instructed in the order of the court, Santiago contacted his local police about Piercy’s violations. They referred him to the Fresno police department, who did visit with Piercy. Piercy told the police that he had a restraining order against Santiago. Subsequently, Piercy would reveal how he came up with that argument. In his appeal brief in the case where he was denied a restraining order against Santiago, Piercy argued that the notice of appeal reinstated the temporary restraining order.
Piercy also told the police that because he filed a notice of appeal, the restraining order against him was “not valid” and arresting him would be unlawful.
Two law enforcement jurisdictions passed the proverbial buck back and forth and did nothing, forcing Santiago to return to court in January 2015 and file to have Piercy held in contempt for violating the restraining order. Santiago, hoping that Piercy would stop with knowledge that he filed the contempt petition, posted on a community Facebook that he had done so. Rather than stopping, Greg Lirette rode into town. He was a stranger. He went after Santiago without mercy. Santiago did not know Lirette and at first, thought that maybe Piercy opened a Twitter account in that name. Upon a closer look however, Lirette had that Twitter account for years, but did not have recent tweets. The same was later discovered with a free Word Press blog – Lirette had one that he had not posted to in years. Unlike blogs, Facebook pages and Twitter accounts that Piercy has and abandoned years ago, the content of Lirette’s older stuff was not demeaning, neither filled with vile name-calling. Lirette was not a sock account for Piercy, nor Vicki, but a real person.
On February 1, 2015, Lirette sent a tweet to Vicki Pate and Piercy acknowledging that he received documents from Piercy that pertained to Santiago.
Lirette launched a website for the specific purpose of dedicating the content to Santiago’s life. The domain name to the website was Santiago’s name. Lirette posted the personal information of Santiago and his minor daughters, Santiago’s wife and her employer, including their contact information. Microsoft took down that site, but restored it on what we understand to be Lirette’s contention that he was not a party to the restraining order.
Santiago spoke with his legal counsel who believed that the domain name, considering the content of the website, constituted identity theft. Santiago contacted law enforcement. Because law enforcement was taking too long to respond, Santiago started collecting evidence to file a civil law suit after the contempt proceeding with Piercy was decided. One step at a time. Almost daily, Santiago was collecting Lirette’s tweets on an hourly basis because Lirette would subsequently delete them, removing evidence from public view of his communications with Pate and Piercy about Santiago.
On February 10, 2015, Lirette let Piercy know that he was updating the website on Santiago.
On a free Word Press blog, Lirette posted the same personal information. Word Press suspended that blog temporarily until Lirette removed the minor’s personal information.
The first hearing on the petition for contempt was scheduled for February 26, 2015. As that date approached, Piercy and Vicki’s illegal activity progressed. On a privately hosted website located in China, and in which Vicki is associated, the same material that Greg Lirette was posting was posted there, along with a threat that Santiago should “back off” or he had a surprise coming. Photos of Santiago’s wife were posted demeaning her for marrying Santiago, and Santiago was accused of being an illegal alien.
Then someone tweeted the link to the college where Santiago’s wife is employed.
If anyone thinks that Lirette entered the picture in effort to stop alleged harassment on Twitter, think again. Lirette did not begin doxing others until after he launched websites and used other websites to post Santiago’s personal information.
Using the website hosted by a company in China to indirectly violate the court’s restraining order, there were also allegations that Santiago was using other handles on Twitter to harass Vicki.
I saw a storm brewing.
Some if not all of the handles alleged by Vicki as being used by Santiago are persons I am familiar with because they wanted approval to follow me on Twitter. (My Twitter account is protected.)
One handle that was alleged by Vicki and Nettles to be used by Santiago is a variation of a handle that Santiago once used. It is not Santiago but another victim of Piercy’s harassment. Piercy is familiar with that person because he photoshopped photos of her deceased mom, made videos about her using her Facebook photo distorting it, and told her to kill herself.
Piercy has also told me to kill myself, but I’m not a person who had recently lost her mom and then saw Piercy distort my deceased mom’s photo to mock and demean her.
The subject person filed a report with her local police in Burlington, MA about Piercy. Piercy taunted that person on Twitter by obtaining a copy of her police report where the reporting officer wrote that Piercy told him to “f—k off.” Piercy used a name in that police report of a local person, and wrongfully applied it to a person who resides in Florida who has the same first name. He began taunting Shannoninmiami accusing her of being a “tranny” because the police referred to a person in Burlington, MA named Shannon as a “he.”
I will publicly state that handle because Twitter has suspended that account. TrayvonWarrior10 was maybe the 5th Twitter account that person opened in effort to have me approve her to follow me on Twitter. The first time after I blocked her, she adopted another handle and asked to follow me. I knew who she was but thought that I would give her another chance. I ended up having to block her again, and declined her next requests to follow me at least 4 times when she used different handles, finally approving her under her handle TrayvonWarrior10 to give her another chance.
I won’t go into details, but I blocked her again shortly thereafter.
Like Vicki, Annette alleged that people tried to get her fired from her job. Annette however, believed that some of the handles weren’t Santiago, but a person known as Danny Warrior that she had personal information about to jump-start Lirette in doxing Danny Warrior. On the belief that Annette Kelly was being harassed by Danny Warrior, Lirette took action to dox for their personal information.
Each time that Annette felt that she was being harassed, she alleged it was Danny Warrior using another handle. Anyone who tweeted to the handle alleged to being used by Danny Warrior was suspect of taking part in harassment.
Things got so bad that Annette told Lirette that he was doxing the wrong people.
Back to Piercy —- he went about on Twitter and other social media saying that he was having the contempt proceeding dismissed. It was not dismissed.
On the morning of February 26, 2015, which was the day of the first hearing on Santiago’s petition to have Piercy held in contempt of court, Greg Lirette warned Santiago that his minor daughters and their future spouses would be a part of “this too.” He named Santiago’s minor daughters in another tweet, and said that he would blog about them and any further relationships they might have. I’m not putting the screenshots of those tweets here because subsequently after the February 26, 2015 hearing, Lirette deleted them and removed all of the material that he posted about Santiago and his family, and took down the website that he specifically opened to post Santiago’s personal information and that of Santiago’s family.
Lirette has apologized to Santiago, and for that we publicly recognize.
We also publicly recognize that the website hosted in China voluntarily removed the harassing material.
Meanwhile, what started off as a surrogate to do Vicki and Piercy’s dirty work, has kept Lirette busy with other things.
Meanwhile, blanc papillon7 was on Twitter directing venom towards me. Her Twitter account was temporarily suspended and she retaliated by opening the misspelled titled blog to defame and demean myself and those who associate with Blackbutterfly7. When opening the misspelled titlted blog, blanc papillon sent a comment to my blog through an email address using the handle “butterflyblood.”
Coming Next: How The Extortionists Wrongfully Accused and Threatened A Retired Physician For Associating With Me.